« Sterile Mall | Main | Data mining privacy issues in a nutshell »

California hands-free cell phone driving law full text plus bonus rant

A month ago, a hoax spread about the California hands-free cell phone driving law activating on July 1 of this year, when it actually goes into effect next year, on July 1, 2008. But what exactly is the law? I went looking for it, and I found the full text of SB-1613. And so there you go. :)

The core of it says:

A person shall not drive a motor vehicle while using a wireless telephone unless that telephone is specifically designed and configured to allow hands-free listening and talking, and is used in that manner while driving.

I originally wrote a big rant here about how unclear the law is about whether we just have to use hands-free mode while listening and talking, or whether we can't do anything except hands-free listening and talking, which would also include dialing and answering. :P But that's not really what's important. What's important is the idiocy of the entire law in the first place.

You see, according to a 2003 study, talking on the phone slows reaction time similarly whether the driving is using a hands-free set or not. The real danger is that the driver's attention is distracted much more so than when they're talking to a passenger in the car. (There are various mental model theories of why this might be so.) I have yet to see any study demonstrate that using a hands-free set is significantly safer. So it really makes no sense to force people to use hands-free sets. Instead of distinguishing between hands-free and hand-held, we should either ban cell phone calls altogether or let us use them however we want.

Looking around on the web for the effects of hands-free laws enacted elsewhere, I see a study in New York saying hand-held cell phone use went down for a while but came back up, a study in D.C. saying hand-held cell phone use went down, and a study in Finland saying hand-held cell phone use went down, but phone-related hazards stayed the same. What none of these studies even discuss, though, is the rate of total cell phone use, adding hand-free and hand-held.

You see, what I'm worried about is that with hands-free sets, people might think it's safer, resulting in the secondary effect of even longer phone calls. And since hands-free and hand-held cell phone use are just as dangerous, laws like the one that just passed in California may well increase accident rates instead of decreasing them. *sigh* This is what happens when the government ignores scientific studies and enacts laws based on what people feel is true. :\

Comments (1)

Oh, it gets worse, TEXTING isn't covered by the law, so the one part of using a phone that takes both audio and visual attention is still legal... *sigh*

Post a comment

LEAVE THIS FIELD BLANK. IT IS HERE TO TRAP ROBOTS.

LEAVE THIS FIELD BLANK. IT IS HERE TO TRAP ROBOTS.

LEAVE THIS FIELD BLANK. IT IS HERE TO TRAP ROBOTS.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on July 30, 2007.

The previous post in this blog was Sterile Mall.

The next post in this blog is Data mining privacy issues in a nutshell.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.3