The first big-screen 9/11 movie is coming out this spring, and its teaser trailer is out. It's directed by Paul Greengrass, who directed Bloody Sunday and The Bourne Supremacy, and it's called Flight 93. (That's the one that crashed into a Pennsylvania field.) There's a New York Times article about it.
What I found most interesting was what Greengrass says in this CHUD interview:
Whats really interesting is that when you look at it like that, you realize something important about Flight 93, which is that it, in many ways, occurred in the post-9/11 world because of the quirk of fate that that airplane was delayed on the ground for forty-five minutes. Not long after it was airborne, the first two planes went into the World Trade Center. By the time Flight 93 was hijacked, the third plane had practically gone into the Pentagon.
What it means is that you had forty people or slightly less, as some had been killed essentially you had a small number of people on an airplane who were the first people to inhabit the post-9/11 world. For all the rest of us, whether we were in civilian air traffic control, Presidential bunkers, or just ordinary folks like us watching on TV, we knew something terrible was happening, but we didnt really know what. We maybe knew it was terrorism, but we didnt know what. But for those people on the airplane they knew exactly what it was, they could see what was facing them, and heres the thing they faced a terrible, terrible dilemma. The dilemma was: what do we do? Do we sit here and hope for the best? Or do we strike back at them before they do what we think they might be about to do? In the course of action of whatever those two choices we make, what are the chances of a good outcome from either of those two choices?
That dilemma is the post-9/11 dilemma. Its the dilemma we have all faced since then.